נגישות
menu      
חיפוש מתקדם
תחביר
חפש...
הספר "אוצר וולקני"
אודות
תנאי שימוש
ניהול
קהילה:
אסיף מאגר המחקר החקלאי
פותח על ידי קלירמאש פתרונות בע"מ -
Leaf shape × sowing density interaction affects chickpea grain yield
Year:
2013
Authors :
בונפיל, דוד
;
.
Volume :
132
Co-Authors:
Abbo, S., The Levi Eshkol School of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
Goren, O., The Levi Eshkol School of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
Saranga, Y., The Levi Eshkol School of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
Langensiepen, M., Institute of Crop Science and Resource Protection, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 5, Bonn, 53115, Germany
J. Bonfil, D., Agricultural Research Organization, Gilat Research Center, MP Negev, 85280, Israel
Facilitators :
From page:
200
To page:
204
(
Total pages:
5
)
Abstract:
Modifying plant architecture is considered a promising breeding option to enhance crop productivity. Modern chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars with either compound (wild-type) or simple leaf shapes are commercially grown but the relationships between leaf shape and yield are not well understood. In this study, a random sample of 'Kabuli' type progeny lines of both leaf types, derived from two crosses between modern American simple leaf cultivars and early-flowering wild-type breeding lines, were planted at different sowing densities. Leaf area development and final grain yield in genotypes of the two leaf types responded differently to changes in sowing densities. Compound leaf lines attained higher leaf area indices and higher grain yields at both low and high sowing densities. Yield responses of the simple leaf lines to increasing sowing density were significantly higher compared to compound leaf genotypes in two of three field experiments. The prospects for utilizing the simple leaf trait as a breeding target for short-season growing areas are discussed. © 2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.
Note:
Related Files :
Cicer arietinum
Grain yield
Leaf shape
Sowing density
עוד תגיות
תוכן קשור
More details
DOI :
10.1111/pbr.12042
Article number:
Affiliations:
Database:
סקופוס
Publication Type:
מאמר
;
.
Language:
אנגלית
Editors' remarks:
ID:
20986
Last updated date:
02/03/2022 17:27
Creation date:
16/04/2018 23:40
Scientific Publication
Leaf shape × sowing density interaction affects chickpea grain yield
132
Abbo, S., The Levi Eshkol School of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
Goren, O., The Levi Eshkol School of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
Saranga, Y., The Levi Eshkol School of Agriculture, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, 76100, Israel
Langensiepen, M., Institute of Crop Science and Resource Protection, University of Bonn, Katzenburgweg 5, Bonn, 53115, Germany
J. Bonfil, D., Agricultural Research Organization, Gilat Research Center, MP Negev, 85280, Israel
Leaf shape × sowing density interaction affects chickpea grain yield
Modifying plant architecture is considered a promising breeding option to enhance crop productivity. Modern chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars with either compound (wild-type) or simple leaf shapes are commercially grown but the relationships between leaf shape and yield are not well understood. In this study, a random sample of 'Kabuli' type progeny lines of both leaf types, derived from two crosses between modern American simple leaf cultivars and early-flowering wild-type breeding lines, were planted at different sowing densities. Leaf area development and final grain yield in genotypes of the two leaf types responded differently to changes in sowing densities. Compound leaf lines attained higher leaf area indices and higher grain yields at both low and high sowing densities. Yield responses of the simple leaf lines to increasing sowing density were significantly higher compared to compound leaf genotypes in two of three field experiments. The prospects for utilizing the simple leaf trait as a breeding target for short-season growing areas are discussed. © 2013 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.
Scientific Publication
You may also be interested in