נגישות
menu      
חיפוש מתקדם
Biological Conservation
Levin, N., Department of Geography, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91905, Israel
Watson, J.E.M., Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED), School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia, Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10460, United States
Joseph, L.N., Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED), School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia, Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10460, United States
Grantham, H.S., Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED), School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202, United States
Hadar, L., Ramat Hanadiv Nature Park, P.O. Box 325, Zikhron Yaakov 30900, Israel
Apel, N., Ramat Hanadiv Nature Park, P.O. Box 325, Zikhron Yaakov 30900, Israel
Perevolotsky, A., Department of Natural Resources, ARO, Volcani Center, P.O. Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
DeMalach, N., The Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Ecology, Behaviour and Evolution, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
Possingham, H.P., Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED), School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia
Kark, S., Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED), School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia, The Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Ecology, Behaviour and Evolution, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
Active and dynamic management of biodiversity is of utmost importance in the face of increasing human pressures on nature. Current approaches for site selection of protected areas often assume that both conservation features and management actions are fixed in space and time. However, this approach should be revised to allow for spatio-temporal shifts of biodiversity features, threats and management options. Our aim here was to demonstrate a novel approach for systematic conservation planning at a fine scale that incorporates dynamic ecological processes (e.g., succession), biodiversity targets and management costs. We used the new 'Marxan with Zones' decision support tool to spatially redistribute the major structural types of vegetation within a privately-owned nature park in Israel and facilitate the achievement of multiple conservation targets for minimum cost. The park is located in the Mediterranean climate region of the eastern Mediterranean Basin, one of Earth's richest biodiversity hotspots. This small park alone (4.5km2) holds 660 species of native plants and six structural types of vegetation. The region has been subject to manifold human pressures such as grazing, clearing and fire for millennia and is currently threatened by a range of modern human-related activities (e.g., invasive alien species). By spatially redistributing the six structural vegetation types under three scenarios, representing different conservation objectives (no change, equal distribution - evenness of structural types, preference to early succession stages) within three budget frameworks, we identified a set of near-optimal conservation strategies that can be enacted over time. The current spatial distribution of structural types and the cost of changing one structural type into another via management actions had a major impact on the spatial prioritization outcomes and management recommendations. Notably, an advanced successional stage (dense Mediterranean garrigue) tended to dominate a large portion of the landscape when the available budgets were low because it is a relatively inexpensive structural type to maintain. The approach presented here can be further applied to spatially prioritize conservation goals in the face of shifting environments and climates, allowing dynamic conservation planning at multiple spatial scales. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
פותח על ידי קלירמאש פתרונות בע"מ -
הספר "אוצר וולקני"
אודות
תנאי שימוש
A framework for systematic conservation planning and management of Mediterranean landscapes
158
Levin, N., Department of Geography, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91905, Israel
Watson, J.E.M., Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED), School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia, Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10460, United States
Joseph, L.N., Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED), School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia, Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, NY 10460, United States
Grantham, H.S., Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED), School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202, United States
Hadar, L., Ramat Hanadiv Nature Park, P.O. Box 325, Zikhron Yaakov 30900, Israel
Apel, N., Ramat Hanadiv Nature Park, P.O. Box 325, Zikhron Yaakov 30900, Israel
Perevolotsky, A., Department of Natural Resources, ARO, Volcani Center, P.O. Box 6, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
DeMalach, N., The Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Ecology, Behaviour and Evolution, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
Possingham, H.P., Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED), School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia
Kark, S., Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED), School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, QLD 4072, Australia, The Biodiversity Research Group, Department of Ecology, Behaviour and Evolution, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel
A framework for systematic conservation planning and management of Mediterranean landscapes
Active and dynamic management of biodiversity is of utmost importance in the face of increasing human pressures on nature. Current approaches for site selection of protected areas often assume that both conservation features and management actions are fixed in space and time. However, this approach should be revised to allow for spatio-temporal shifts of biodiversity features, threats and management options. Our aim here was to demonstrate a novel approach for systematic conservation planning at a fine scale that incorporates dynamic ecological processes (e.g., succession), biodiversity targets and management costs. We used the new 'Marxan with Zones' decision support tool to spatially redistribute the major structural types of vegetation within a privately-owned nature park in Israel and facilitate the achievement of multiple conservation targets for minimum cost. The park is located in the Mediterranean climate region of the eastern Mediterranean Basin, one of Earth's richest biodiversity hotspots. This small park alone (4.5km2) holds 660 species of native plants and six structural types of vegetation. The region has been subject to manifold human pressures such as grazing, clearing and fire for millennia and is currently threatened by a range of modern human-related activities (e.g., invasive alien species). By spatially redistributing the six structural vegetation types under three scenarios, representing different conservation objectives (no change, equal distribution - evenness of structural types, preference to early succession stages) within three budget frameworks, we identified a set of near-optimal conservation strategies that can be enacted over time. The current spatial distribution of structural types and the cost of changing one structural type into another via management actions had a major impact on the spatial prioritization outcomes and management recommendations. Notably, an advanced successional stage (dense Mediterranean garrigue) tended to dominate a large portion of the landscape when the available budgets were low because it is a relatively inexpensive structural type to maintain. The approach presented here can be further applied to spatially prioritize conservation goals in the face of shifting environments and climates, allowing dynamic conservation planning at multiple spatial scales. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
Scientific Publication
You may also be interested in