Loyau, T., INRA, URA, Nouzilly, France
Hennequet-Antier, C., INRA, URA, Nouzilly, France
Coustham, V., INRA, URA, Nouzilly, France
Berri, C., INRA, URA, Nouzilly, France
Leduc, M., INRA, URA, Nouzilly, France
Crochet, S., INRA, URA, Nouzilly, France
Sannier, M., INRA, URA, Nouzilly, France
Duclos, M.J., INRA, URA, Nouzilly, France
Mignon-Grasteau, S., INRA, URA, Nouzilly, France
Tesseraud, S., INRA, URA, Nouzilly, France
Brionne, A., INRA, URA, Nouzilly, France
Métayer-Coustard, S., INRA, URA, Nouzilly, France
Moroldo, M., INRA, CRB GADIE, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France
Lecardonnel, J., INRA, CRB GADIE, Domaine de Vilvert, Jouy-en-Josas, France
Martin, P., Plateforme de Microgénomique Iso Cell Express (ICE), GABI, INRA, Jouy-en-Josas, France
Lagarrigue, S., Agrocampus Rennes, PEGASE, INRA, Saint-Gilles, France
Yahav, S., The Volcani Center, Institute of Animal Science, P.O. Box 6, Bet Dagan, Israel
Collin, A., INRA, URA, Nouzilly, France

Background: Meat type chickens have limited capacities to cope with high environmental temperatures, this sometimes leading to mortality on farms and subsequent economic losses. A strategy to alleviate this problem is to enhance adaptive capacities to face heat exposure using thermal manipulation (TM) during embryogenesis. This strategy was shown to improve thermotolerance during their life span. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of TM (39.5 °C, 12 h/24 vs 37.8 °C from d7 to d16 of embryogenesis) and of a subsequent heat challenge (32 °C for 5 h) applied on d34 on gene expression in the Pectoralis major muscle (PM). A chicken gene expression microarray (8 × 60 K) was used to compare muscle gene expression profiles of Control (C characterized by relatively high body temperatures, Tb) and TM chickens (characterized by a relatively low Tb) reared at 21 °C and at 32 °C (CHC and TMHC, respectively) in a dye-swap design with four comparisons and 8 broilers per treatment. Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was subsequently performed to validate differential expression in each comparison. Gene ontology, clustering and network building strategies were then used to identify pathways affected by TM and heat challenge. Results: Among the genes differentially expressed (DE) in the PM (1.5 % of total probes), 28 were found to be differentially expressed between C and TM, 128 between CHC and C, and 759 between TMHC and TM. No DE gene was found between TMHC and CHC broilers. The majority of DE genes analyzed by RT-qPCR were validated. In the TM/C comparison, DE genes were involved in energy metabolism and mitochondrial function, cell proliferation, vascularization and muscle growth; when comparing heat-exposed chickens to their own controls, TM broilers developed more specific pathways than C, especially involving genes related to metabolism, stress response, vascularization, anti-apoptotic and epigenetic processes. Conclusions: This study improved the understanding of the long-term effects of TM on PM muscle. TM broilers displaying low Tb may have lower metabolic intensity in the muscle, resulting in decreased metabolic heat production, whereas modifications in vascularization may enhance heat loss. These specific changes could in part explain the better adaptation of TM broilers to heat. © 2016 Loyau et al.