Segev, O., Institute of Evolution, Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
Polevikove, A., Institute of Evolution, Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
Blank, L., Institute of Evolution, Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel, Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Research, ARO, Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
Goedbloed, D., Technical University of Braunschweig, Zoological Institute, Braunschweig, Germany
Küpfer, E., Technical University of Braunschweig, Zoological Institute, Braunschweig, Germany
Gershberg, A., Institute of Evolution, Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
Koplovich, A., Institute of Evolution, Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
Blaustein, L., Institute of Evolution, Department of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

Tail-tip clipping is a common technique for collecting tissue samples from amphibian larvae and adults. Surprisingly, studies of this invasive sampling procedure or of natural tail clipping - i.e., bites inflicted by predators including conspecifics - on the performance and fitness of aquatic larval stages of urodeles are scarce. We conducted two studies in which we assessed the effects of posterior tail clipping (∼30 percent of tail) on Near Eastern fire salamander (Salamandra infraimmaculata) larvae. In a laboratory study, we checked regeneration rates of posterior tail-tip clipping at different ages. Regeneration rates were hump-shaped, peaking at the age of ∼30 days and then decreasing. This variation in tail regeneration rates suggests tradeoffs in resource allocation between regeneration and somatic growth during early and advanced development. In an outdoor artificial pond experiment, under constant larval densities, we assessed how tail clipping of newborn larvae affects survival to, time to, and size at metamorphosis. Repeated measures ANOVA on mean larval survival per pond revealed no effect of tail clipping. Tail clipping had correspondingly no effect on larval growth and development expressed in size (mass and snout-vent length) at, and time to, metamorphosis. We conclude that despite the given variation in tail regeneration rates throughout larval ontogeny, clipping of 30% percent of the posterior tail area seems to have no adverse effects on larval fitness and survival. We suggest that future use of this imperative tool for the study of amphibian should take into account larval developmental stage during the time of application and not just the relative size of the clipped tail sample. © 2015 Segev et al.