נגישות
menu      
חיפוש מתקדם
תחביר
חפש...
הספר "אוצר וולקני"
אודות
תנאי שימוש
ניהול
קהילה:
אסיף מאגר המחקר החקלאי
פותח על ידי קלירמאש פתרונות בע"מ -
In vitro methods for measuring the dry matter digestibility of ruminant feedstuffs: Comparison of methods and inoculum source
Year:
2000
Source of publication :
Journal of Dairy Science
Authors :
מבג'יש, סמיר
;
.
Volume :
83
Co-Authors:
Mabjeesh, S.J., Department of Animal Sciences, Fac. Agric., Food, Environ. Qual. S., P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Cohen, M., Department of Animal Sciences, Fac. Agric., Food, Environ. Qual. S., P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Arieli, A., Department of Animal Sciences, Fac. Agric., Food, Environ. Qual. S., P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Facilitators :
From page:
2289
To page:
2294
(
Total pages:
6
)
Abstract:
We conducted this study to evaluate the new in vitro system, DAISYII, to determine dry matter (DM) digestibility in ruminant feedstuffs. Results from the DAISYII were compared to those obtained by the traditional Tilly and Terry method. The traditional method buffer was used for both methods. We also compared two sources of rumen inoculum from sheep and dairy cows. Seventeen different feeds were tested, grouped into roughage, concentrate, and CP supplements. The experiment was replicated on two different occasions for all feeds and the two sources of inoculum. The source of inoculum and the time at which it was collected had no effect on the in vitro DM digestibility of the feedstuffs in either of the methods. The DAISYII DM digestibility value compared well with the traditional method values for the roughage group; however, for some feedstuffs in the concentrate and CP supplement groups, the DAISYII values were significantly higher than the traditional method values. Regression analysis of the feeds that resulted in similar values with the two methods revealed that the DAISYII method can be used to predict in vitro digestibility with relatively small variation.
Note:
Related Files :
Animal
Animals
cattle
Female
Male
Methods
Microbiology
sensitivity and specificity
sheep
עוד תגיות
תוכן קשור
More details
DOI :
Article number:
Affiliations:
Database:
סקופוס
Publication Type:
מאמר
;
.
Language:
אנגלית
Editors' remarks:
ID:
31257
Last updated date:
02/03/2022 17:27
Creation date:
17/04/2018 01:01
You may also be interested in
Scientific Publication
In vitro methods for measuring the dry matter digestibility of ruminant feedstuffs: Comparison of methods and inoculum source
83
Mabjeesh, S.J., Department of Animal Sciences, Fac. Agric., Food, Environ. Qual. S., P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Cohen, M., Department of Animal Sciences, Fac. Agric., Food, Environ. Qual. S., P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Arieli, A., Department of Animal Sciences, Fac. Agric., Food, Environ. Qual. S., P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel
In vitro methods for measuring the dry matter digestibility of ruminant feedstuffs: Comparison of methods and inoculum source
We conducted this study to evaluate the new in vitro system, DAISYII, to determine dry matter (DM) digestibility in ruminant feedstuffs. Results from the DAISYII were compared to those obtained by the traditional Tilly and Terry method. The traditional method buffer was used for both methods. We also compared two sources of rumen inoculum from sheep and dairy cows. Seventeen different feeds were tested, grouped into roughage, concentrate, and CP supplements. The experiment was replicated on two different occasions for all feeds and the two sources of inoculum. The source of inoculum and the time at which it was collected had no effect on the in vitro DM digestibility of the feedstuffs in either of the methods. The DAISYII DM digestibility value compared well with the traditional method values for the roughage group; however, for some feedstuffs in the concentrate and CP supplement groups, the DAISYII values were significantly higher than the traditional method values. Regression analysis of the feeds that resulted in similar values with the two methods revealed that the DAISYII method can be used to predict in vitro digestibility with relatively small variation.
Scientific Publication
You may also be interested in