נגישות
menu      
Advanced Search
Syntax
Search...
Volcani treasures
About
Terms of use
Manage
Community:
אסיף מאגר המחקר החקלאי
Powered by ClearMash Solutions Ltd -
Longwave emission from a plant/soil surface as a function of the view direction: Dependence on the canopy architecture
Year:
1999
Authors :
Fuchs, Marcel
;
.
Volume :
20
Co-Authors:
Otterman, J., LAOR, Inc., Code 910.4, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States, Code 923, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States, ARO-Institute of Soils and Water, Volcani Center, PO Box 25, Bet Dagan, Israel, Code 910.4, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States, USRA, Code 913, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Brakke, T.W., LAOR, Inc., Code 910.4, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Fuchs, M., LAOR, Inc., Code 910.4, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Lakshmi, V., LAOR, Inc., Code 910.4, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Cadeddu, M., LAOR, Inc., Code 910.4, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Facilitators :
From page:
2195
To page:
2201
(
Total pages:
7
)
Abstract:
We examine the longwave emission from a structured surface: soil partially covered by an incomplete (not very dense) plane-parallel canopy. The soil (seen through the gaps) is assumed to be at uniform temperature and warmer than the plants. Different canopy architectures are constructed by varying the ratio K of the projection of the vertical elements (thin cylinders, or blades with a uniform distribution in azimuth) to the area of the horizontal facets, while specifying that the gap function (the probability of non-interception, that is, of seeing the soil through the canopy) remains constant (at about 0.5) when viewing the surface at a zenith angle 0v of 50°. Assuming initially that the temperature is uniform throughout the canopy, we note that the observed emission (the measured surface temperature) decreases with increasing zenith angle of observation, as more canopy and less soil is seen in the field of view. The pattern of the change is commonly applied to infer both canopy and soil temperatures. When the architecture tends to be more vertical (as quantified by a higher K), the pattern is modified: the emission becomes appreciably higher in the nadir region (more soil is seen) but lower towards the limb, that is, at larger 0v (more plants are seen). Thus, when interpreting the pattern of the emission for a range of 0v to estimate the temperature difference between the soil and the canopy, an overestimate results if the tendency to the vertical is underestimated. The analysis of the radiance as a function of the view zenith angle is extended to a canopy with plant-element temperature increasing with the optical depth in the canopy (where the rate specifying the increase of the emission from the plants with the optical depth is adjusted to maintain the continuity of the temperature at the canopy bottom (canopy/soil interface)). The pattern with Ov of the emitted radiance is, in these cases, closely similar to that for a warm soil/uniformtemperature canopy, especially if the canopy optical depth is large. This analysis indicates that information about the properties of the canopy (optical (radiative transfer) depth, andcharacterization of the architecture) should be available for an appropriate interpretation of the longwave radiances in terms of the canopy temperature, andthrough this interpretation, assessment of the evapotranspiration rate. Inversion of the solar bidirectional reflectances measured simultaneously with the longwave measurements is likely to be the best source of this information. © 1999 Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Note:
Related Files :
evapotranspiration
Interfaces (materials)
longwave radiation
remote sensing
soil
zenith angle
Show More
Related Content
More details
DOI :
Article number:
Affiliations:
Database:
Scopus
Publication Type:
article
;
.
Language:
English
Editors' remarks:
ID:
18709
Last updated date:
02/03/2022 17:27
Creation date:
16/04/2018 23:23
Scientific Publication
Longwave emission from a plant/soil surface as a function of the view direction: Dependence on the canopy architecture
20
Otterman, J., LAOR, Inc., Code 910.4, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States, Code 923, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States, ARO-Institute of Soils and Water, Volcani Center, PO Box 25, Bet Dagan, Israel, Code 910.4, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States, USRA, Code 913, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Brakke, T.W., LAOR, Inc., Code 910.4, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Fuchs, M., LAOR, Inc., Code 910.4, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Lakshmi, V., LAOR, Inc., Code 910.4, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Cadeddu, M., LAOR, Inc., Code 910.4, NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Longwave emission from a plant/soil surface as a function of the view direction: Dependence on the canopy architecture
We examine the longwave emission from a structured surface: soil partially covered by an incomplete (not very dense) plane-parallel canopy. The soil (seen through the gaps) is assumed to be at uniform temperature and warmer than the plants. Different canopy architectures are constructed by varying the ratio K of the projection of the vertical elements (thin cylinders, or blades with a uniform distribution in azimuth) to the area of the horizontal facets, while specifying that the gap function (the probability of non-interception, that is, of seeing the soil through the canopy) remains constant (at about 0.5) when viewing the surface at a zenith angle 0v of 50°. Assuming initially that the temperature is uniform throughout the canopy, we note that the observed emission (the measured surface temperature) decreases with increasing zenith angle of observation, as more canopy and less soil is seen in the field of view. The pattern of the change is commonly applied to infer both canopy and soil temperatures. When the architecture tends to be more vertical (as quantified by a higher K), the pattern is modified: the emission becomes appreciably higher in the nadir region (more soil is seen) but lower towards the limb, that is, at larger 0v (more plants are seen). Thus, when interpreting the pattern of the emission for a range of 0v to estimate the temperature difference between the soil and the canopy, an overestimate results if the tendency to the vertical is underestimated. The analysis of the radiance as a function of the view zenith angle is extended to a canopy with plant-element temperature increasing with the optical depth in the canopy (where the rate specifying the increase of the emission from the plants with the optical depth is adjusted to maintain the continuity of the temperature at the canopy bottom (canopy/soil interface)). The pattern with Ov of the emitted radiance is, in these cases, closely similar to that for a warm soil/uniformtemperature canopy, especially if the canopy optical depth is large. This analysis indicates that information about the properties of the canopy (optical (radiative transfer) depth, andcharacterization of the architecture) should be available for an appropriate interpretation of the longwave radiances in terms of the canopy temperature, andthrough this interpretation, assessment of the evapotranspiration rate. Inversion of the solar bidirectional reflectances measured simultaneously with the longwave measurements is likely to be the best source of this information. © 1999 Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Scientific Publication
You may also be interested in