נגישות
menu      
Advanced Search
Syntax
Search...
Volcani treasures
About
Terms of use
Manage
Community:
אסיף מאגר המחקר החקלאי
Powered by ClearMash Solutions Ltd -
Footprint Estimation for Multi-Layered Sources and Sinks Inside Canopies in Open and Protected Environments
Year:
2015
Source of publication :
Boundary-Layer Meteorology
Authors :
Tanny, Josef
;
.
Volume :
155
Co-Authors:
Duman, T., Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
Tanny, J., Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
Dicken, U., Environmental Sciences and Energy Research, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Siqueira, M.B., Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidade de Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil
Katul, G.G., Nicholas School of the Environment & Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
Facilitators :
From page:
229
To page:
248
(
Total pages:
20
)
Abstract:
A multi-layered flux footprint model is developed for a canopy situated within a protected environment such as a screenhouse. The model accounts for the vertically distributed sources and sinks within the canopy as well as modifications introduced by the screen on the flow field and micro-environment. The effect of the screen on fetch as a function of its relative height above the canopy is then studied and compared to the case where the screen is absent. It is found that the required fetch is not appreciably affected by the vertical source–sink distribution in open and protected environments, but changes with the canopy density. Moreover, the fetch-to-height ratio is increased by the presence of the screen, at least when compared to the open environment case. How footprint analysis can be employed to estimate the ratio between above-canopy measured flux and vertically-integrated canopy source–sink strengths in a prototypical screenhouse is illustrated and further evaluated against eddy-covariance measurements from two screenhouse experiments. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Note:
Related Files :
Canopy turbulence
Footprint analysis
Lagrangian stochastic model
Microenvironments
turbulent boundary layer
Show More
Related Content
More details
DOI :
10.1007/s10546-014-9999-y
Article number:
Affiliations:
Database:
Scopus
Publication Type:
article
;
.
Language:
English
Editors' remarks:
ID:
19887
Last updated date:
02/03/2022 17:27
Creation date:
16/04/2018 23:32
You may also be interested in
Scientific Publication
Footprint Estimation for Multi-Layered Sources and Sinks Inside Canopies in Open and Protected Environments
155
Duman, T., Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
Tanny, J., Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel
Dicken, U., Environmental Sciences and Energy Research, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Siqueira, M.B., Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidade de Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil
Katul, G.G., Nicholas School of the Environment & Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
Footprint Estimation for Multi-Layered Sources and Sinks Inside Canopies in Open and Protected Environments
A multi-layered flux footprint model is developed for a canopy situated within a protected environment such as a screenhouse. The model accounts for the vertically distributed sources and sinks within the canopy as well as modifications introduced by the screen on the flow field and micro-environment. The effect of the screen on fetch as a function of its relative height above the canopy is then studied and compared to the case where the screen is absent. It is found that the required fetch is not appreciably affected by the vertical source–sink distribution in open and protected environments, but changes with the canopy density. Moreover, the fetch-to-height ratio is increased by the presence of the screen, at least when compared to the open environment case. How footprint analysis can be employed to estimate the ratio between above-canopy measured flux and vertically-integrated canopy source–sink strengths in a prototypical screenhouse is illustrated and further evaluated against eddy-covariance measurements from two screenhouse experiments. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Scientific Publication
You may also be interested in