נגישות
menu      
Advanced Search
Syntax
Search...
Volcani treasures
About
Terms of use
Manage
Community:
אסיף מאגר המחקר החקלאי
Powered by ClearMash Solutions Ltd -
The Chickpea, summer cropping, and a new model for pulse domestication in the ancient Near East
Year:
2003
Source of publication :
Quarterly Review of Biology
Authors :
Shtienberg, Dan
;
.
Volume :
78
Co-Authors:
Abbo, S., Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Shtienberg, D., Department of Plant Pathology, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Lichtenzveig, J., Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Lev-Yadun, S., Department of Biology, Fac. of Sci. and Science Education, University of Haifa-Oranim, Tivon 36006, Israel
Gopher, A., Sonia Marco Nadler Inst. of Archaeo., Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel
Facilitators :
From page:
435
To page:
448
(
Total pages:
14
)
Abstract:
The widely accepted models describing the emergence of domesticated grain crops from their wild type ancestors are mostly based upon selection (conscious or unconscious) of major features related either to seed dispersal (nonbrittle ear, indehiscent pod) or free germination (nondormant seeds, soft seed coat). Based on the breeding systems (self-pollination) and dominance relations between the allelomorphs of seed dispersal mode and seed dormancy, it was postulated that establishment of the domesticated forms and replacement of the wild ancestral populations occurred in the Near East within a relatively short time. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), however, appears as an exception among all other "founder crops" of Old World agriculture because of its ancient conversion into a summer crop. The chickpea is also exceptional because its major domestication trait appears to be vernalization insensitivity rather than pod indehiscence or free germination. Moreover, the genetic basis of vernalization response in wild chickpea (Cicer reticulatum Ladiz.) is polygenic, suggesting that a long domestication process was imperative due to the elusive phenotype of vernalization nonresponsiveness. There is also a gap in chickpea remains in the archaeological record between the Late Prepottery Neolithic and the Early Bronze Age. Contrary to the common view that Levantine summer cropping was introduced relatively late (Early Bronze Age), we argue for an earlier (Neolithic) Levantine origin of summer cropping because chickpea, when grown as a common winter crop, was vulnerable to the devastating pathogen Didymella rabiei, the causal agent of Ascochyta blight. The ancient (Neolithic) conversion of chickpea into a summer crop required seasonal differentiation of agronomic operation from the early phases of the Neolithic revolution. This topic is difficult to deal with, as direct data on seasonality in prehistoric Old World field crop husbandry are practically nonexistent. Consequently, this issue was hardly dealt with in the literature. Information on the seasonality of ancient (Neolithic, Chalcolithic, and Early Bronze Age, calibrated 11,500 to 4,500 years before present) Near Eastern agriculture may improve our understanding of the proficiency of early farmers. This in turn may provide a better insight into Neolithic agrotechniques and scheduling. It is difficult to fully understand chickpea domestication without a Neolithic seasonal differentiation of agronomic practice because the rapid establishment of the successful Near Eastern crop package which included wheats, barley, pea, lentil, vetches, and flax, would have preempted the later domestication of this rare wild legume.
Note:
Related Files :
Agriculture
Ascochyta
Cicer arietinum
Fabaceae
germination
Microbiology
Pisum sativum
Plant Disease
Review
Show More
Related Content
More details
DOI :
10.1086/378927
Article number:
Affiliations:
Database:
Scopus
Publication Type:
Review
;
.
Language:
English
Editors' remarks:
ID:
21055
Last updated date:
02/03/2022 17:27
Creation date:
16/04/2018 23:41
You may also be interested in
Scientific Publication
The Chickpea, summer cropping, and a new model for pulse domestication in the ancient Near East
78
Abbo, S., Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Shtienberg, D., Department of Plant Pathology, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Lichtenzveig, J., Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Lev-Yadun, S., Department of Biology, Fac. of Sci. and Science Education, University of Haifa-Oranim, Tivon 36006, Israel
Gopher, A., Sonia Marco Nadler Inst. of Archaeo., Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel
The Chickpea, summer cropping, and a new model for pulse domestication in the ancient Near East
The widely accepted models describing the emergence of domesticated grain crops from their wild type ancestors are mostly based upon selection (conscious or unconscious) of major features related either to seed dispersal (nonbrittle ear, indehiscent pod) or free germination (nondormant seeds, soft seed coat). Based on the breeding systems (self-pollination) and dominance relations between the allelomorphs of seed dispersal mode and seed dormancy, it was postulated that establishment of the domesticated forms and replacement of the wild ancestral populations occurred in the Near East within a relatively short time. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), however, appears as an exception among all other "founder crops" of Old World agriculture because of its ancient conversion into a summer crop. The chickpea is also exceptional because its major domestication trait appears to be vernalization insensitivity rather than pod indehiscence or free germination. Moreover, the genetic basis of vernalization response in wild chickpea (Cicer reticulatum Ladiz.) is polygenic, suggesting that a long domestication process was imperative due to the elusive phenotype of vernalization nonresponsiveness. There is also a gap in chickpea remains in the archaeological record between the Late Prepottery Neolithic and the Early Bronze Age. Contrary to the common view that Levantine summer cropping was introduced relatively late (Early Bronze Age), we argue for an earlier (Neolithic) Levantine origin of summer cropping because chickpea, when grown as a common winter crop, was vulnerable to the devastating pathogen Didymella rabiei, the causal agent of Ascochyta blight. The ancient (Neolithic) conversion of chickpea into a summer crop required seasonal differentiation of agronomic operation from the early phases of the Neolithic revolution. This topic is difficult to deal with, as direct data on seasonality in prehistoric Old World field crop husbandry are practically nonexistent. Consequently, this issue was hardly dealt with in the literature. Information on the seasonality of ancient (Neolithic, Chalcolithic, and Early Bronze Age, calibrated 11,500 to 4,500 years before present) Near Eastern agriculture may improve our understanding of the proficiency of early farmers. This in turn may provide a better insight into Neolithic agrotechniques and scheduling. It is difficult to fully understand chickpea domestication without a Neolithic seasonal differentiation of agronomic practice because the rapid establishment of the successful Near Eastern crop package which included wheats, barley, pea, lentil, vetches, and flax, would have preempted the later domestication of this rare wild legume.
Scientific Publication
You may also be interested in