נגישות
menu      
Advanced Search
Syntax
Search...
Volcani treasures
About
Terms of use
Manage
Community:
אסיף מאגר המחקר החקלאי
Powered by ClearMash Solutions Ltd -
Functional divergence of a syntenic invertase gene family in tomato, potato, and Arabidopsis
Year:
2003
Source of publication :
Plant physiology (source)
Authors :
Fridman, Eyal
;
.
Volume :
131
Co-Authors:
Fridman, E., Dept. of Molec., Cell./Devmtl. Biol., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, United States
Zamir, D., Dept. of Field and Vegetable Crops, Otto Warburg Ctr. for Biotechnology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Facilitators :
From page:
603
To page:
609
(
Total pages:
7
)
Abstract:
Comparative analysis of complex developmental pathways depends on our ability to resolve the function of members of gene families across taxonomic groups. LIN5, which belongs to a small gene family of apoplastic invertases in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), is a quantitative trait locus that modifies fruit sugar composition. We have compared the genomic organization and expression of this gene family in the two distantly related species: tomato and Arabidopsis. Invertase family members reside on segmental duplications in the near-colinear genomes of tomato and potato (Solanum tuberosum). These chromosomal segments are syntenically duplicated in the model plant Arabidopsis. On the basis of phylogenetic analysis of genes in the microsyntenic region, we conclude that these segmental duplications arose independently after the separation of the tomato/potato clade from Arabidopsis. Rapid regulatory divergence is characteristic of the invertase family. Interestingly, although the processes of gene duplication and specialization of expression occurred separately in the two species, synteny-based orthologs from both clades acquired similar organ-specific expression. This similar expression pattern of the genes is evidence of comparable evolutionary constraints (parallel evolution) rather than of functional orthology. The observation that functional orthology cannot be identified through analysis of expression similarity highlights the caution that needs to be exercised in extrapolating developmental networks from a model organism.
Note:
Related Files :
arabidopsis
Genes
genetic engineering
multigene family
Solanum
Solanum tuberosum
Show More
Related Content
More details
DOI :
10.1104/pp.014431
Article number:
Affiliations:
Database:
Scopus
Publication Type:
article
;
.
Language:
English
Editors' remarks:
ID:
25731
Last updated date:
02/03/2022 17:27
Creation date:
17/04/2018 00:17
You may also be interested in
Scientific Publication
Functional divergence of a syntenic invertase gene family in tomato, potato, and Arabidopsis
131
Fridman, E., Dept. of Molec., Cell./Devmtl. Biol., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, United States
Zamir, D., Dept. of Field and Vegetable Crops, Otto Warburg Ctr. for Biotechnology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Functional divergence of a syntenic invertase gene family in tomato, potato, and Arabidopsis
Comparative analysis of complex developmental pathways depends on our ability to resolve the function of members of gene families across taxonomic groups. LIN5, which belongs to a small gene family of apoplastic invertases in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), is a quantitative trait locus that modifies fruit sugar composition. We have compared the genomic organization and expression of this gene family in the two distantly related species: tomato and Arabidopsis. Invertase family members reside on segmental duplications in the near-colinear genomes of tomato and potato (Solanum tuberosum). These chromosomal segments are syntenically duplicated in the model plant Arabidopsis. On the basis of phylogenetic analysis of genes in the microsyntenic region, we conclude that these segmental duplications arose independently after the separation of the tomato/potato clade from Arabidopsis. Rapid regulatory divergence is characteristic of the invertase family. Interestingly, although the processes of gene duplication and specialization of expression occurred separately in the two species, synteny-based orthologs from both clades acquired similar organ-specific expression. This similar expression pattern of the genes is evidence of comparable evolutionary constraints (parallel evolution) rather than of functional orthology. The observation that functional orthology cannot be identified through analysis of expression similarity highlights the caution that needs to be exercised in extrapolating developmental networks from a model organism.
Scientific Publication
You may also be interested in