נגישות
menu      
Advanced Search
Syntax
Search...
Volcani treasures
About
Terms of use
Manage
Community:
אסיף מאגר המחקר החקלאי
Powered by ClearMash Solutions Ltd -
Quantifying drylands' drought resistance and recovery: The importance of drought intensity, dominant life history and grazing regime
Year:
2015
Source of publication :
Global Change Biology
Authors :
Henkin, Zalmen
;
.
Volume :
21
Co-Authors:
Ruppert, J.C., Range Ecology and Range Management, Botanical Institute, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Harmoney, K., Agricultural Research Center - Hays, Kansas State University, Hays, KS, United States
Henkin, Z., Newe-Ya'ar Research Center, Department of Natural Resources, Agricultural Research Organization, Ramat Yishay, Israel
Snyman, H.A., Department of Animal, Wildlife and Grassland Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
Sternberg, M., Department of Molecular Biology and Ecology of Plants, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Willms, W., Agriculture and AgriFood Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Linstädter, A., Range Ecology and Range Management, Botanical Institute, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Facilitators :
From page:
1258
To page:
1270
(
Total pages:
13
)
Abstract:
Projected global change will increase the level of land-use and environmental stressors such as drought and grazing, particularly in drylands. Still, combined effects of drought and grazing on plant production are poorly understood, thus hampering adequate projections and development of mitigation strategies. We used a large, cross-continental database consisting of 174 long-term datasets from >30 dryland regions to quantify ecosystem responses to drought and grazing with the ultimate goal to increase functional understanding in these responses. Two key aspects of ecosystem stability, resistance to and recovery after a drought, were evaluated based on standardized and normalized aboveground net primary production (ANPP) data. Drought intensity was quantified using the standardized precipitation index. We tested effects of drought intensity, grazing regime (grazed, ungrazed), biome (grassland, shrubland, savanna) or dominant life history (annual, perennial) of the herbaceous layer to assess the relative importance of these factors for ecosystem stability, and to identify predictable relationships between drought intensity and ecosystem resistance and recovery. We found that both components of ecosystem stability were better explained by dominant herbaceous life history than by biome. Increasing drought intensity (quasi-) linearly reduced ecosystem resistance. Even though annual and perennial systems showed the same response rate to increasing drought intensity, they differed in their general magnitude of resistance, with annual systems being ca. 27% less resistant. In contrast, systems with an herbaceous layer dominated by annuals had substantially higher postdrought recovery, particularly when grazed. Combined effects of drought and grazing were not merely additive but modulated by dominant life history of the herbaceous layer. To the best of our knowledge, our study established the first predictive, cross-continental model between drought intensity and drought-related relative losses in ANPP, and suggests that systems with an herbaceous layer dominated by annuals are more prone to ecosystem degradation under future global change regimes. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Note:
Related Files :
animal husbandry
biome
climate change
drought
drought resistance
net primary production
plant physiology
season
Show More
Related Content
More details
DOI :
10.1111/gcb.12777
Article number:
Affiliations:
Database:
Scopus
Publication Type:
article
;
.
Language:
English
Editors' remarks:
ID:
26730
Last updated date:
02/03/2022 17:27
Creation date:
17/04/2018 00:25
You may also be interested in
Scientific Publication
Quantifying drylands' drought resistance and recovery: The importance of drought intensity, dominant life history and grazing regime
21
Ruppert, J.C., Range Ecology and Range Management, Botanical Institute, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Harmoney, K., Agricultural Research Center - Hays, Kansas State University, Hays, KS, United States
Henkin, Z., Newe-Ya'ar Research Center, Department of Natural Resources, Agricultural Research Organization, Ramat Yishay, Israel
Snyman, H.A., Department of Animal, Wildlife and Grassland Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
Sternberg, M., Department of Molecular Biology and Ecology of Plants, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Willms, W., Agriculture and AgriFood Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Linstädter, A., Range Ecology and Range Management, Botanical Institute, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Quantifying drylands' drought resistance and recovery: The importance of drought intensity, dominant life history and grazing regime
Projected global change will increase the level of land-use and environmental stressors such as drought and grazing, particularly in drylands. Still, combined effects of drought and grazing on plant production are poorly understood, thus hampering adequate projections and development of mitigation strategies. We used a large, cross-continental database consisting of 174 long-term datasets from >30 dryland regions to quantify ecosystem responses to drought and grazing with the ultimate goal to increase functional understanding in these responses. Two key aspects of ecosystem stability, resistance to and recovery after a drought, were evaluated based on standardized and normalized aboveground net primary production (ANPP) data. Drought intensity was quantified using the standardized precipitation index. We tested effects of drought intensity, grazing regime (grazed, ungrazed), biome (grassland, shrubland, savanna) or dominant life history (annual, perennial) of the herbaceous layer to assess the relative importance of these factors for ecosystem stability, and to identify predictable relationships between drought intensity and ecosystem resistance and recovery. We found that both components of ecosystem stability were better explained by dominant herbaceous life history than by biome. Increasing drought intensity (quasi-) linearly reduced ecosystem resistance. Even though annual and perennial systems showed the same response rate to increasing drought intensity, they differed in their general magnitude of resistance, with annual systems being ca. 27% less resistant. In contrast, systems with an herbaceous layer dominated by annuals had substantially higher postdrought recovery, particularly when grazed. Combined effects of drought and grazing were not merely additive but modulated by dominant life history of the herbaceous layer. To the best of our knowledge, our study established the first predictive, cross-continental model between drought intensity and drought-related relative losses in ANPP, and suggests that systems with an herbaceous layer dominated by annuals are more prone to ecosystem degradation under future global change regimes. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Scientific Publication
You may also be interested in