נגישות
menu      
Advanced Search
Syntax
Search...
Volcani treasures
About
Terms of use
Manage
Community:
אסיף מאגר המחקר החקלאי
Powered by ClearMash Solutions Ltd -
A comparison between the effects of ventilation and evaporative cooling on greenhouse air and crop temperatures
Year:
2008
Source of publication :
Acta Horticulturae
Authors :
Barak, Moti
;
.
Cohen, Shabtai
;
.
Tanny, Josef
;
.
Teitel, Meir
;
.
Volume :
797
Co-Authors:
Teitel, M., Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, P.O.B. 6, Bet Dagan, 50250, Israel
Barak, M., Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, P.O.B. 6, Bet Dagan, 50250, Israel
Tanny, J., Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, P.O.B. 6, Bet Dagan, 50250, Israel
Cohen, S., Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, P.O.B. 6, Bet Dagan, 50250, Israel
Zhao, Y., Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Jiaxing University, 56 Yuexiu Road, Jiaxing 314001, Zhejiang, China
Facilitators :
From page:
173
To page:
178
(
Total pages:
6
)
Abstract:
In warm climates, heat is removed from greenhouses either by ventilation only (VO), usually natural ventilation (NV) or by evaporative cooling which is more expensive. Microclimate and crop responses were investigated over several summer periods in rose, pepper and tomato crops grown, in most of the experiments, simultaneously in adjacent greenhouses with VO and evaporative cooling. Evaporative cooling was implemented with a Fan and Pad (FP) system while VO with fans in the pepper experiments and NV for the tomato and rose crops. In each treatment micrometeorological and plant parameters were monitored continuously over several days. For FP, greenhouse air temperature was always lower than with VO, as expected. Foliage was usually warmer than the greenhouse air with FP and cooler than greenhouse air with VO.
Note:
Related Files :
Evaporative cooling
Fan and Pad
Lycopersicon esculentum
Pepper
Protected cultivation
Ventilation
Show More
Related Content
More details
DOI :
Article number:
Affiliations:
Database:
Scopus
Publication Type:
Conference paper
;
.
Language:
English
Editors' remarks:
ID:
27174
Last updated date:
02/03/2022 17:27
Creation date:
17/04/2018 00:28
Scientific Publication
A comparison between the effects of ventilation and evaporative cooling on greenhouse air and crop temperatures
797
Teitel, M., Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, P.O.B. 6, Bet Dagan, 50250, Israel
Barak, M., Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, P.O.B. 6, Bet Dagan, 50250, Israel
Tanny, J., Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, P.O.B. 6, Bet Dagan, 50250, Israel
Cohen, S., Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, P.O.B. 6, Bet Dagan, 50250, Israel
Zhao, Y., Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Jiaxing University, 56 Yuexiu Road, Jiaxing 314001, Zhejiang, China
A comparison between the effects of ventilation and evaporative cooling on greenhouse air and crop temperatures
In warm climates, heat is removed from greenhouses either by ventilation only (VO), usually natural ventilation (NV) or by evaporative cooling which is more expensive. Microclimate and crop responses were investigated over several summer periods in rose, pepper and tomato crops grown, in most of the experiments, simultaneously in adjacent greenhouses with VO and evaporative cooling. Evaporative cooling was implemented with a Fan and Pad (FP) system while VO with fans in the pepper experiments and NV for the tomato and rose crops. In each treatment micrometeorological and plant parameters were monitored continuously over several days. For FP, greenhouse air temperature was always lower than with VO, as expected. Foliage was usually warmer than the greenhouse air with FP and cooler than greenhouse air with VO.
Scientific Publication
You may also be interested in