Advanced Search
Liu, J., School of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Sui, Y., School of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Wisniewski, M., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Kearneysville, WV 25430, United States
Droby, S., Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Liu, Y., School of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Bio-resource and Eco-environment, College of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610064, China
Significant losses in harvested fruit can be directly attributable to decay fungi. Some of these pathogenic fungi are also the source of mycotoxins that are harmful to humans. Biological control of postharvest decay of fruits, vegetables and grains using antagonistic yeasts has been explored as one of several promising alternatives to chemical fungicides, the use of which is facing increasingly more stringent regulation. Yeast species have been isolated over the past two decades from a variety of sources, including fruit surfaces, the phyllosphere, soil and sea water, and their potential as postharvest biocontrol agents has been investigated. Several mechanisms have been proposed as responsible for their antagonistic activity, including competition for nutrients and space, parasitism of the pathogen, secretion of antifungal compounds, induction of host resistance, biofilm formation, and most recently, the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in defense response. It has been recognized that a biocontrol system is composed of a three-way interaction between the host (commodity), the pathogen and the yeast, all of which are affected by environmental factors. Efficacy and consistent performance in controlling postharvest diseases are the hurdles that must be overcome if the use of yeast biocontrol agents and other alternatives are to be widely used commercially. Therefore, attempts have been made to combine alternative treatments in order improve their overall performance. The current review provides a brief overview of the topic of the use of yeasts as postharvest biocontrol agents and includes information on the sources from which yeast antagonists have been isolated, their mode of action, and abiotic stress resistance in yeast as it relates to biocontrol performance. Areas in need of future research are also highlighted. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.
Powered by ClearMash Solutions Ltd -
Volcani treasures
About
Terms of use
Review: Utilization of antagonistic yeasts to manage postharvest fungal diseases of fruit
167
Liu, J., School of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Sui, Y., School of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
Wisniewski, M., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Kearneysville, WV 25430, United States
Droby, S., Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel
Liu, Y., School of Biotechnology and Food Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Bio-resource and Eco-environment, College of Life Science, State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610064, China
Review: Utilization of antagonistic yeasts to manage postharvest fungal diseases of fruit
Significant losses in harvested fruit can be directly attributable to decay fungi. Some of these pathogenic fungi are also the source of mycotoxins that are harmful to humans. Biological control of postharvest decay of fruits, vegetables and grains using antagonistic yeasts has been explored as one of several promising alternatives to chemical fungicides, the use of which is facing increasingly more stringent regulation. Yeast species have been isolated over the past two decades from a variety of sources, including fruit surfaces, the phyllosphere, soil and sea water, and their potential as postharvest biocontrol agents has been investigated. Several mechanisms have been proposed as responsible for their antagonistic activity, including competition for nutrients and space, parasitism of the pathogen, secretion of antifungal compounds, induction of host resistance, biofilm formation, and most recently, the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in defense response. It has been recognized that a biocontrol system is composed of a three-way interaction between the host (commodity), the pathogen and the yeast, all of which are affected by environmental factors. Efficacy and consistent performance in controlling postharvest diseases are the hurdles that must be overcome if the use of yeast biocontrol agents and other alternatives are to be widely used commercially. Therefore, attempts have been made to combine alternative treatments in order improve their overall performance. The current review provides a brief overview of the topic of the use of yeasts as postharvest biocontrol agents and includes information on the sources from which yeast antagonists have been isolated, their mode of action, and abiotic stress resistance in yeast as it relates to biocontrol performance. Areas in need of future research are also highlighted. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.
Scientific Publication
You may also be interested in