נגישות
menu      
Advanced Search
Syntax
Search...
Volcani treasures
About
Terms of use
Manage
Community:
אסיף מאגר המחקר החקלאי
Powered by ClearMash Solutions Ltd -
Toward a Unified Framework in Biodiversity Studies
Year:
2005
Authors :
Perevolotsky, Avi
;
.
Volume :
Co-Authors:

James R. Gosz

Avi Perevolotsky

Facilitators :
From page:
0
To page:
0
(
Total pages:
1
)
Abstract:

Biodiversity has been defined as the “full variety of life on Earth” (Takacs 1996). Because biodiversity refers to a fundamental property of ecological systems, it continues to develop as a scientific frontier for exploration and discovery. Ecological systems are a mixture, or diversity, of living and nonliving entities interconnected by a web of interactions. Biodiversity is a concept used to describe the number, variety, and organization of entities in the biosphere, or a unit of the biosphere, and their relationships to each other (Gaston 1996). More importantly, biodiversity includes consideration of processes that create and maintain variation in ecological systems (Groombridge 1992). Therefore, biodiversity is not simply about entities and taxonomy. Rather, biodiversity is concerned with the diversity of species within communities, the range of ecological processes within ecosystems, and the diversity of ecosystem processes across landscape mosaics (Heywood 1994, Levin 1997). A similar perspective on biodiversity is provided by Noss (1990), who applies the concept over hierarchical levels of organization ranging from the gene to the entire biosphere, and recognizes compositional, structural, and functional approaches to biodiversity. In contrast to this broad and comprehensive scope of biodiversity suggested above, researchers and conservationists often employ a narrow definition of biodiversity shaped by their values, interests, and goals. A more precise and more widely recognized interpretation of the scope of biodiversity is required in order to promote scientific research and to develop management programs (Christensen et al. 1996). The objective of this chapter is to build on the comprehensive framework for biodiversity proposed in the introduction (chapter 1, fig.1.1) and combine it with additional insights from the other chapters. The initial framework recognizes biodiversity to include four components, and one complex output. The components are the roster of entities, the number of each kind of entity, the nature and degree of difference between the entities, and the spatial or functional organization of the entities. The outcome is the effect of biodiversity on ecosystem processes. This framework enables us to (1) map, in a more unified way, the present achievements of research in the field of biodiversity, (2) understand the complexity of biodiversity, and (3) advance the scientific basis for biodiversity management.

Note:
Related Files :
Australia
Community Ecology
Entities
fire disturbance
Global change
herbivory
Land use
Patch biological
Sahel [Sub-Saharan Africa]
Show More
Related Content
More details
DOI :
10.1093/oso/9780195139853.003.0026
Article number:
0
Affiliations:
Database:
Publication Type:
Book chapter
;
.
Language:
English
Editors' remarks:
ID:
55679
Last updated date:
02/03/2022 17:27
Creation date:
20/07/2021 16:34
Scientific Publication
Toward a Unified Framework in Biodiversity Studies

James R. Gosz

Avi Perevolotsky

Toward a Unified Framework in Biodiversity Studies

Biodiversity has been defined as the “full variety of life on Earth” (Takacs 1996). Because biodiversity refers to a fundamental property of ecological systems, it continues to develop as a scientific frontier for exploration and discovery. Ecological systems are a mixture, or diversity, of living and nonliving entities interconnected by a web of interactions. Biodiversity is a concept used to describe the number, variety, and organization of entities in the biosphere, or a unit of the biosphere, and their relationships to each other (Gaston 1996). More importantly, biodiversity includes consideration of processes that create and maintain variation in ecological systems (Groombridge 1992). Therefore, biodiversity is not simply about entities and taxonomy. Rather, biodiversity is concerned with the diversity of species within communities, the range of ecological processes within ecosystems, and the diversity of ecosystem processes across landscape mosaics (Heywood 1994, Levin 1997). A similar perspective on biodiversity is provided by Noss (1990), who applies the concept over hierarchical levels of organization ranging from the gene to the entire biosphere, and recognizes compositional, structural, and functional approaches to biodiversity. In contrast to this broad and comprehensive scope of biodiversity suggested above, researchers and conservationists often employ a narrow definition of biodiversity shaped by their values, interests, and goals. A more precise and more widely recognized interpretation of the scope of biodiversity is required in order to promote scientific research and to develop management programs (Christensen et al. 1996). The objective of this chapter is to build on the comprehensive framework for biodiversity proposed in the introduction (chapter 1, fig.1.1) and combine it with additional insights from the other chapters. The initial framework recognizes biodiversity to include four components, and one complex output. The components are the roster of entities, the number of each kind of entity, the nature and degree of difference between the entities, and the spatial or functional organization of the entities. The outcome is the effect of biodiversity on ecosystem processes. This framework enables us to (1) map, in a more unified way, the present achievements of research in the field of biodiversity, (2) understand the complexity of biodiversity, and (3) advance the scientific basis for biodiversity management.

Scientific Publication
You may also be interested in