נגישות
menu      
Advanced Search
Syntax
Search...
Volcani treasures
About
Terms of use
Manage
Community:
אסיף מאגר המחקר החקלאי
Powered by ClearMash Solutions Ltd -
Reply on "Comment on Applications of the water-content-based form of the Richards' equation to heterogeneous soils"
Year:
1999
Source of publication :
Water Resources Research
Authors :
Russo, David
;
.
Volume :
35
Co-Authors:
Facilitators :
From page:
609
To page:
610
(
Total pages:
2
)
Abstract:

In their comment, Labolle and Clausnitzer [this issue] review assumptions implicit in the water-content-based form of the Richards' equation and comment on the relevant literature. To illustrate the pitfalls of omitting a clear presentation of the restrictions associated with the use of this form of the Richards equation, they call attention to Russo [1991] as a case where it appears that this form of the Richards equation has been misapplied. They did not provide, however, any sort of analysis that might quantify the implications of this misapplication. Here I will concentrate on the criticism raised in the comment regarding Russo [1991] only.

Note:
Related Files :
Heterogeneous soils
Water content
Show More
Related Content
More details
DOI :
Article number:
0
Affiliations:
Database:
Publication Type:
Comment / Commentary
;
.
Language:
English
Editors' remarks:
ID:
56057
Last updated date:
02/03/2022 17:27
Creation date:
24/08/2021 12:58
You may also be interested in
Scientific Publication
Reply on "Comment on Applications of the water-content-based form of the Richards' equation to heterogeneous soils"
35
Reply on "Comment on Applications of the water-content-based form of the Richards' equation to heterogeneous soils"

In their comment, Labolle and Clausnitzer [this issue] review assumptions implicit in the water-content-based form of the Richards' equation and comment on the relevant literature. To illustrate the pitfalls of omitting a clear presentation of the restrictions associated with the use of this form of the Richards equation, they call attention to Russo [1991] as a case where it appears that this form of the Richards equation has been misapplied. They did not provide, however, any sort of analysis that might quantify the implications of this misapplication. Here I will concentrate on the criticism raised in the comment regarding Russo [1991] only.

Scientific Publication
You may also be interested in